Part of Stockyard Swamp - "perched swamp"
A sedge/rush complex primarily.
A sedge/rush complex primarily.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8acbe/8acbe47db09f5613c7a4bfcccc6add1cb4ea66f5" alt=""
Powerline easement - looking east, from near Stockyard Swamp.
Slashed heathland.
Slashed heathland.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db3cd/db3cd8511192b08944210ef78193d1beed530acd" alt=""
Powerline easement, looking back past Tourist Road
The ridge on the Moresby Hill area is visible.
The ridge on the Moresby Hill area is visible.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58b1c/58b1c2be17c570094c7c71f2d61cbbfb7f856748" alt=""
Naturally, I am not inclined to support that view, coming to the issue as a naturalist. To me it is obvious that water is the very essence of this environment, and to take out large volumes of groundwater must surely compromise this environment. Such issues are not subject to "human" assessments as to whether or not there is water "to spare" here. This is not a "equity" issue - it is a matter of how the local environment is mean to work. You cannot look at it and decided that it has more water than it needs or is "fair". Such concepts are simply not appropriate.
We understand that the SCA's Environment Assessment will be available for public comment in April.
Here is a photo looking back towards the top of Mount Murray. It serves to show how close this borefield is to settled areas around Robertson. Click on the photo to enlarge it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20f7d/20f7d5df81dea682547e87452cece9ec7c93a035" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment