data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dac5b/dac5bc617c6b023c6a2b87ec103052743dafae5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d13d/7d13dbb6c48187e81ac41e4a2404edde0e497fc9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a671/2a6712d752cfa409f839dd4dbfbc0653a659eb4c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/613b1/613b11e48256063e3a180e83b3b8fe659f01fd46" alt="".jpg)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/556a4/556a45df4f3bb0d26fdfeb92303627df416c5159" alt="".jpg)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6aa68/6aa6859c9d5748c0e4f5520ce33d709c450055ef" alt=""
A BLOG ABOUT THE NATURE OF ROBERTSON, NSW, AUSTRALIA
ABOUT THINGS WHICH GROW HERE, NATURALLY; SOME OF MY SPECIAL INTERESTS - NATIVE PLANTS AND INSECTS, AND CULTIVARS OF PEONIES AND ROSES WHICH I GROW.
AND ABOUT LIFE IN ROBERTSON, TOO.
Thanks to the magic of the Bureau of Meteorology's website, you can see there is a high pressure system parked just west of Tasmania, with a low out in the Tasman Sea - and that gives direct northerly winds between both systems. That chart is from two days ago (5 am, 22/10/08)
We here in Robertson have shivered for the last 3 days. By chance (not really) I awoke shivering in my bed. I was really cold. I happened to glance at my handy indoor/outdoor thermometer (in the corner of my bedroom) just to see what was going on. It was showing 3 degrees Celsius outside. It gave me a generous reading of 5 degrees inside. That is to be expected in July, but not mid October. Plus it has been "windy as...." - by then a howling gale had arrived.
"A low pressure system over the Tasman sea had the effect of sucking up frigid air from Australia's south, delivering a record breaking cold snap and even snow to highland areas across NSW.
"Bureau of Meteorology senior forecaster Jake Phillips said it was the coldest two days, back to back, in an October since 1973. With the cold temperatures came blustery winds and intermittent showers."
By one of those ironies of Google-based advertising on Internet websites, the SMH story about Sydney's "Tasmanian-style" weather, they carried this advertisement - right next to the lead paragraph.
The curved shape of these flowers is important, for Honeyeaters have long thin, curved beaks which they use to poke inside the tubular flowers of the Waratah, in search of the reward of some nectar. As they do so, they touch the pollen presenter, and receive a dusting of pollen on top of their forehead (or just around the beak). The bird then goes off to another flower. And if that flower is at the slightly later stage of development, when its female stigma is now mature (sticky), it till be able to receive pollen dusted onto it by the bird's feathers on its forehead.
You will often notice a Honeyeater (of some description) sitting on top of a Waratah flower. As it reaches down toward the base of the flower, to get the nectar, its head will come down from above the flower, making a perfect match between its forehead and the position of the stigma. That is why Waratah flowers are shaped they way they are - to suit the pollinators which have evolved with them.
I noticed today that my blogging colleague who writes "A Snail's Eye View" has written a report on pollination structures in Western Australian Banksias, which are related plants, despite some apparent differences. Their internal flower structure is very similar, and hence the pollination process is nearly identical, except that they rely more on insects, and tiny "Honey Possums" for pollination. Banksias develop a woody cone after pollination, whereas Waratahs develop a pod. Apart from that the pollination system is very similar indeed. You can also clearly see on Snail's Blog that Banksia flowers are also held in "pairs", even though the overall structure is also a "conflorescence" (as is the Waratah head).
In an example of "parallel evolution" many red tubular flowers in Central and South America are pollinated by Hummingbirds, which are not particularly closely relate to our Honeyeaters, but which have adapted to feed on long tubular red flowers. As they do so, Hummingbirds receive dobs of pollen on their foreheads, from the plants, which they then take on to other plants. Sound familiar?
In my opinion, this is just an illustration of the fact that plants have shaped the world to suit their interests.
And we like to kid ourselves that we are the "masters of the universe"?
*****
And then, sometime after 4:00pm, along came Mr Fibby.This amazing group were the most accomplished musicians, with the most imaginative stage show it has been my pleasure to witness in a very long time. According to a somewhat dubious biography, they are "Borracio" - on Cello, "Seraphina" - on Violin, and "Zavi"- on guitar. The artist known as "Not Important" is billed as providing the vocals. In fact his stage presence, even when silent, is very powerful.
Their own "blurb" shows their literary style and humour (which owes something to "Borat"):
"Mr. Fibby are to engulf you in a howling dervish of despair. With them you shall wander through faux fairy tales most lamentable, past monstrous trees, men once dead, jealous lovers, lost gypsies, shattered hearts and a moon, as red as blood. The musicians shall pluck at your heart, as well as their instruments, while a lone man (from where? from when?) spins tales as delicate, and as deadly, as a spider’s web."
"Three young, up and coming acoustic musicians have joined forces with an established playwright and story teller to form a unique group - Mr. Fibby."
"These innovative Canberrans collaborate to perform a highly skilled, endearing and frequently comical ‘manouche’ style show which has already proven to delight and enthrall audiences."
"Mr. Fibby are come to you from a place that you do not know.
There is to be laughter, there is to be tears."
The foot of the Artist known as "Not Important" - a comic/tragic genius.
This performance was the highlight of the Springtime in Robertson program for me.
But I can still barely forgive the organisers for such an ill-judged combination of events (on a single bill).
Don't get me wrong - the people who did not walk out (including myself) - loved Mr Fibby's performance.
But many of the audience would have every right to feel that the choice of program was inappropriate.
*****
If only Mr Fibby had been billed for the Saturday night - the party could have kicked on for hours, and a great atmosphere, suitable to the content of their performance, could have been engendered. It could have been a legendary performance - as it was indeed fit to be.
And, as a Cabaret performance, appropriately advertised, it would most likely have packed the Hall, which might have helped with the other unspoken problem with the Springtime in Robertson program.